About Me

Name: raymondr612001
Email: raymondr612001@yahoo.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

365/285

 
 01-20-10
 
 
285 Days to the 2010 Congressional Mid-Term Elections
 
TO MY READERS:
 
I apologize for being AWOL the past few weeks. I have been making upgrades to my computer and they have taken more time than planned. Rest assured, however, I have and will keep a eye on events concerning the coming political year. Thnk you for your patience.
 
    As you can gather from the title of this writing, today marks day 365 of the Obama regime and 285 days before we can shut his leftist thug cronies down. It took Barack Obama just one year to bring our country to the brink of economic ruin with his massive tax hikes and his socialist spending agenda. One year  to compromise our national security to the point where an al Queda operative from Nigeria nearly brought down a commercial airliner over Detroit with a bomb sewn into his shorts and one year to anger the American people to the point where Republican Scott Brown was able to win Ted Kennedy's Senate seat in Massachusetts starting a political purge not seen since the Republicans castrated Bill Clinton in 1994. Already Democratic pundits are stating that Congressional Dems may not be so ready to commit political suicide to toe the party line on issues such as health care reform and the economy. It is quite possible that Obama may find himself shoved under the bus by the Democratic National Committee if the Republicans can flip the House and maybe gain more seats in the Senate in November. We can only hope.  Stay Tuned.
 
"Enough Said!"
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Punts on Afghanistan: What Else is New?

12-09-09
327 Days to the 2010 Congressional Mid-Term Elections
 
 
     After three months of teeth-gnashing and hand-wringing, "President" Obama  finally forced to face reality and made a decision on sending more troops to Afghanistan. However, rather than send the 40,000 extra Soldiers and Marines requested by U.S. Forces Commander General Stanley McChrystal, Obama announced only 30,000 would be deployed. On top of that, Obama then said U.S. troops would begin pulling out of Afghanistan within 18 months (depending  of course on the "situation on the ground"). For an administration determined to avoid another Vietnam situation, it's beginning to look just like Vietnam. In particular, letting the enemy know when we start our withdrawl  and when they can begin an assault that will lead to the fall of the government we set up after we leave. It seems obvious the Obama regime is not interested in ending this war properly, with a victory over the Taliban and al Queda and the securing of a pro-western government in Kabul. Obam is only interested in appeasing anti-war supporters who now believe we should pull out of Afghanistan as well as Iraq, which is strange because opponentsto the Iraq war argued that we should focus our efforts on
Afghanistan. Now they don't want us to win there either.
 
    Question: Why is it  Obama won't even say the words "Victory" or "Win"?  Could it be because that was what the Bush Administration was aiming for....Victory? Is Obama willing to throw away 8 years of effort to avenge 9/11, prevent the Taliban from regaining control and allowing Osama Bin Laden's thugs safe haven in Afghanistan? For What..to justify his Nobel Peace Prize? More likely he needed to get back in good standing with the radical left who think America needs to get another bloody nose.   If American forces don't get the green light to win this war outright with The Commander-In-Chief's full support, destroy al Queda and the Taliban forever and leave Afghanistan better than the way we found it, then Obama had better get them out now and take responsibility for whatever happens next. Let them win or pull them out.
 
"Enough Said!"
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

To My Readers...

11-18-09
348 Days to the 2010 Congressional Mid-Term Elections.
 
     The past few weeks have been eventful with victories for Conservatives in New Jersey and Virgina Governor's races as well as tragedy at Ft. Hood, Texas and the continuing battle over health care reform on the Hill. One instance may not be as noteworthy as those I mentioned, that we now have less than a year to go (348 days) before we get our chance to shut down the Obama political machine by voting out the liberal liars thieves and hypocrites who make up the current Congress and replace them with conservatives who hold tight to Ronald Reagan's visions of limited government, fiscal responsibility and strong national defense. 348 days to prove to the American people that the conservative movement is the answer to our current plight. Until that night next November when we can pink slip Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and the rest of Obama's fellow travellers, we need to keep up the pressure on Capitol Hill to back off on taxes and government expansion. The tea party protests must go on and keep up the momentum. The e-mails to Congress must continue without let up. Make them listen if we have to scream to the top of our lungs  If we slack off for even a second, the far-left will say, and rightly so, that the movement had no real credibility and we were just "Astro-Turf".  348 days and counting. 348 days to FREEDOM!!
 
"Enough Said!"
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dow Breaks 10,000: BIG DEAL!!!

10-28-09
369 Days to the 2010 Congressional Mid-Term Elections

    So the Dow Jones finally broke the 10,000 barrier for the first time since last fall....BIG DEAL!!! Those yahoos on Wall Street may be popping the champagne  corks and partying like it was the good old days again, but we aren't. We are still fighting to keep home and hearth together waiting for our own economic fortunes to change. Sure, the Dow is a reliable barometer of how our economy will fare in the future and that for all intents and purposes the recession is over. Tell that to those of us on the ground waiting for the recovery to reach us. As is stands now, unemployment is at or near 10% nationwide. In Michigan the jobless figure is at 15% (one of the highest in the country) and Detroit comes in at 30%.... 30%!!! One out of three Detroit Residents is out of work and barely getting by on unemployment benefits that are almost depleted. In California, thousands of farmers and oil workers have been put out of work to appease radical environmentalists who would rather see families go on welfare that risk harm to either whales in the Pacific or small minnows in the Central Valley. Not to mention California is just about bankrupt, paying their bills with IOUs  and driving people out of the state with rising taxes (Nice Going, Arnie). Auto workers nationwide are watching their jobs sent overseas because of Union greed. People are cashing in their 401Ks and other retirement savings just to keep roofs over their heads. Wall Street got a bailout. The Auto Industry got a bailout. Mr. Obama....Where's our bailout?

"Enough Said!" Congrats, Wall Street.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize....WHY?!!

10-14-09
383 Days to the 2010 Congressional Mid-Term Elections

   I wanted to take this time to catch up on some of the issues of the past few weeks. I wanted to talk about the myriad "Czars" the Obama regime has in place to undermine congressional oversight of policies best enacted by elected officials and those who must pass muster with Congress under "Advise and Consent." I wanted to give a good righteous Hoorah to citizen journalists James O'Keefe and Hannah Giles for exposing corruption within the ACORN organization. This was before word came that Barack Obama had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Now these stories and my commentary on them will have to wait. Rest assured those who deserve praise will be praised while those in need of a good tearing of a new one will be so torn.

   The questions I keep asking, along with most conservatives, is this: Why Him? What has Obama done to earn this honor? How many wars has he ended with diplomacy? How many wars has he stopped from starting? What has he done? The answer I keep coming up with is 0, ZIP, NADA, GOOSE EGG. In essence He ain't done JACK DIDDLY SQUAT!!! Theodore Roosevelt brokered a deal that ended a war between Russia and Japan in 1905. Woodrow Wilson led the way to organize the League of Nations (a precursor to the United Nations) after leading  winning World War I (although the United States did not join the league). Another question that comes to mind is this: What has Obama risked to earn the Nobel? Past winners like Dr. Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela were jailed for standing up for their beliefs. Mandela spent 28 years in a South African Jail rather than sell out his people in the battle to end Apartheid in South Africa. I did not support his Marxist philosophy, but He had the guts to pay the price. King faced down rednecks that hid behind badges and cross-burning Klansmen who hid behind hoods (COWARDS ALL!!!) in the name of freedom. Lech Walesa risked being hauled off to a soviet gulag when he led the Solidarity Movement that freed Poland in the 1980s. When did Barack Obama face either death or imprisonment? NEVER!!! Obama has what Federal Reserve Newsletter (FRN) Publisher Chris Dardzinski calls "Soft Hands." having never faced the kind of dangers King, Mandela or Walesa dealt with.

     Another school of thought holds that perhaps the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded as a sort of "Thank You" from global leftists for Obama's "World Apology Tour" earlier this year. Many in the far left around the world despised President Bush for his going it alone in his fight against terrorism including the Liberation of Iraq and the overall "War on Terror." They  are of a mind that America owes the world an apology and Obama gave the world that mea culpa. Then Obama sold out Poland and the Czech Republic and caved to Russian demands to cancel the deployment of a missile defense system within their borders to fend off missile strikes from Iran (can you say "appeasement?"). The final betrayal came at the annual Meeting of the UN General Assembly when Obama pretty much shoved Israel under that well-known bus of his by not reading Iran the riot act about their nuclear program.

     He has compromised our national security, crippled our economy and castrated our country in the eyes of the world. If that is what got him the Nobel Peace Prize, by screwing his own country over, then by all means he has earned it. Congratulations, Mr. Obama (Now I know I will never address him as "Mr. President.").

"Enough Said!" 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ted Kennedy was NO SAINT!!!

 08-27-09

431 Days to the 2010 Congressional Mid-Term Elections

From Newsmax.com

Chappaquiddick Tragedy Mars Kennedy Legacy

Wednesday, August 26, 2009 1:56 PM

By: David A. Patten 

 

There's a tear in your eye,

And I'm wondering why,

For it never should be there at all.

With such pow'r in your smile,

Sure a stone you'd beguile,

So there's never a teardrop should fall.

-- Lyrics, "When Irish Eyes Are Smiling," a Kennedy family favorite

 

 

"On July 18, 1969, at approximately 11:15 p.m., on Chappaquiddick Island, Martha's Vineyard, I was driving my car on Main Street on my way to get the ferry back to Edgartown."

Thus began Sen. Ted Kennedy's written statement for police in Edgartown, Mass., on the morning after the disastrous wreck that claimed the life of Mary Jo Kopechne.

Kopechne was a "boiler room girl" in RFK's campaign who had accepted an invitation to a regatta party attended by five other women and six men, including Kennedy.

Shortly after she stepped into Kennedy's sedan, ostensibly for a ride home, she was trapped in the car, struggling for her life as dark saltwater relentlessly rushed into the vehicle after it careened off a bridge.

[Editor's Note: Read “The Last Lion of Camelot: Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, 1932-2009” Go here now.]

Kennedy's subsequent, detached explanation of the accident stated: "I was unfamiliar with the road and turned on to Dike Road instead of bearing left on Main Street. After proceeding for approximately a half mile on Dike Road I descended a hill and came upon a narrow bridge. The car went off the side of the bridge. There was one passenger in the car with me, Miss _______, a former secretary of my brother Robert Kennedy. The car turned over and sank into the water and landed with the roof resting on the bottom."

Kennedy left a blank after "Miss" because he wasn't sure how to spell the last name of the young lady whose life had been extinguished the night before.

"I attempted to open the door and window of the car but have no recollection of how I got out of the car. I came to the surface and then repeatedly dove down to the car in an attempt to see if the passenger was still in the car. I was unsuccessful in the attempt.

"I was exhausted and in a state of shock. I recall walking back to where my friends were eating. There was a car parked in front of the cottage and I climbed into the back seat. I then asked for someone to bring me back to Edgartown. I remember walking around for a period of time and then going back to my hotel room. When I fully realized what happened this morning, I immediately contacted the police."

In the days that followed, Kennedy would claim to be as mystified by his own experiences as everyone else was.

In a subsequent TV statement, Kennedy said his efforts to save Kopechne "succeeded only in increasing my state of utter exhaustion and alarm," adding: "My conduct and conversations during the next several hours to the extent that I can remember them make no sense to me at all. Although my doctors informed me that I suffered a cerebral concussion as well as shock, I do not seek to escape responsibility for my actions by placing the blame either on the physical, emotional trauma brought on by the accident or on anyone else."

Legally speaking, Kennedy did essentially escape responsibility. The judge gave him a two month sentence for failing to report an accident, and the sentence was suspended. But politically, the cost would be high indeed. Although Massachusetts voters quickly forgave their favorite son, public reaction to the largely unexplained incident caused permanent damage to Kennedy's reputation.

Author Matthew Smith's 2005 book, "Conspiracy: The Plot to Stop the Kennedys," delved into the many still-unanswered questions about the accident. Kennedy's statement to police only raised more questions, as Time magazine put it at the time "in the absence of an adequate explanation from Kennedy." For example:

 

  •  Why didn't Kennedy's driver, who had transported him to the party and was there, do the driving that night?

     

     

  •  If Kennedy was driving Kopechne to her hotel room in Edgartown, as stated, why did she leave her purse and her hotel key behind at the party?

     

     

  •  How was it Kennedy took the wrong turn when he had traveled to and from his destination several times that week?

     

     

  •  Had Kopechne survived for a time by breathing from a pocket of air trapped in the vehicle after it was submerged, as put forward by John Farrar, the diver who retrieved her from the vehicle?

     

    Those unanswered questions indicate that, although Kopechne's body eventually was extricated from the unforgiving depths, the full truth of what happened that night, still lies submerged beneath them. Kennedy author Mel Ayton has written that conspiracy theorists should keep in mind that amnesia is consistent with the head injuries Kennedy sustained that night. In a 1980 television broadcast, Kennedy said, "I know there are many who do not believe it but my testimony is the only truth I can tell because that is the way it happened."

    Time magazine would report that, immediately after the accident, a phalanx of 16 Kennedy wise men gathered at the Hyannis Port home. They included former Defense Secretary Robert McNamara, adviser Arthur M. Schlesinger, economist John Kenneth Galbraith, and noted JFK speechwriter Theodore Sorenson. It is reasonable to assume the topic du jour was damage control. In April 1970, Judge James A. Boyle, who presided over the inquest that probed Kopechne's death, ordered that the 764-page transcript of that inquest be released. It revealed that Boyle did not believe Kennedy was disclosing the entire truth about the incident.

    "I infer," Boyle stated carefully, "that Kennedy did not intend to drive to the ferry slip and his turn onto Dyke [sic] Road was intentional."

    Based on the fact that Kennedy had passed over the bridge earlier that day, the judge said: "I believe it probable that Kennedy knew of the hazard that lay ahead of him on Dyke [sic] Road but that, for some reason not apparent from the testimony, he failed to exercise due care as he approached the bridge. I, therefore, find there is probably cause to believe that Edward M. Kennedy operated his motor vehicle negligently . . . and that such operation appears to have contributed to the death of Mary Jo Kopechne."

    The Globe reported that Kennedy rejected those findings as "not justified." Just a few days after the inquest transcript was released, Boyle retired from the bench.

    Kennedy reached a $141,000 settlement with Kopechne's parents, $50,000 of which his insurance company paid. That fall, Massachusetts voters re-elected him over Republican Josiah Spaulding, with 63 percent of the vote. Kennedy appeared to pay a price in January 1971, when Democrats opted to replace him as majority whip with Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia.

    In the months that followed, Kennedy would find the U.S. Senate to be his only true escape from an existence that, by then, had taken on at times a nightmarish quality. It was there that Kennedy gradually would build his formidable political legacy.

    'Nothing but the Truth'

    However, heartbreak wasn't even close to giving up its embrace on the senator from Massachusetts. In November 1973, close to the 10th anniversary of the assassination of JFK, the senator received the devastating news that his oldest son, 12-year-old Edward Jr., had cancer in his right leg. After consulting with numerous specialists, Kennedy had to look his son in the eye and tell him his leg would have to be amputated above the knee.

    The surgery was performed on Nov. 16, 1973. As told in "Last Lion," the senator escorted his son into the operating room at Georgetown University Hospital. From there, he rushed to Holy Trinity Church to walk niece Kathleen, RFK's daughter, down the aisle. Her wedding ceremony ended with a moving rendition of "When Irish Eyes Are Smiling," and more than a few eyes that day broke father Joseph's commandment never to shed tears. Then it was back to the hospital for the senator, to wait at his son's bedside.

    He would shepherd the boy through two years of chemotherapy, an experimental treatment at the time who side effects were even more devastating than they remain today.

    That experience would spur Kennedy's lifelong interest in healthcare. Years later, he attributed his passionate support for the patients bill of rights to watching less wealthy families struggle with the economic burden of caring for loved ones.

    Kennedy's appetite for philandering and robust parties apparently did not diminish. In 1992, Richard E. Burke, Kennedy's longtime personal aide, penned a book titled "The Senator: My 10 Years With Ted Kennedy." It presented a firsthand, sordid portrait of drugs, booze, and sexual licentiousness.

    Burke worked for Kennedy from 1971 to 1981, and the credibility of Burke's insider account has been called into question. In the early 1980s, Burke pleaded guilty to carrying a pistol without a license. In return, charges of filing false police reports were dropped.

    Burke blames his problems on his years of hard partying, much of it with Kennedy, which he says left him with a serious cocaine problem. Also, in 1991, Burke filed for bankruptcy, which led some to suggest his tell-all had a financial motivation.

    Burke's ends his story about Kennedy with the words: "Everything described in this book did happen. This book can't pretend to be the whole truth, but it is part of the truth, and it certainly is nothing but the truth." The Kennedy clan, of course, dismissed it as anything but.

    The question of exactly when, how, and why Kennedy experienced the personal reformation that propelled him to forge perhaps the most impressive legislative record of the past half century has been the subject of much speculation, if not myth-making. By all accounts, his bacchanalian predilections continued well into the '70s, and many biographers credit his 1992 marriage to lawyer Victoria Anne Reggie with stabilizing his life.

    One of the key experiences that contributed to Kennedy's personal evolution was his failed attempt to wrest his party's nomination from incumbent President Jimmy Carter. Kennedy's bid was burdened by the legacy of Chappaquiddick in a post-Watergate era that was increasingly intolerant of politico malfeasance and disco-era profligacy. But the greatest wound his campaign sustained came from Kennedy himself, when CBS newsman Roger Mudd asked Kennedy why he wanted to be president.

    "Well," the senator began, "I'm — were I to — to make the — announcement . . . is because I have a great belief in this country, that it is — has more natural resources than any nation in the world . . . the greatest technology of any country in the world . . . the great political system in the world . . . And the energies and the resourcefulness of this nation, I think, should be focused on these problems in a way that brings a sense of restoration in this country by its people . . . And I would basically feel that — that it's imperative for this country to either move forward, that it can't stand still, or otherwise it moves back."

    It was as if Kennedy's presumption of his divine birthright to America's political throne had led him to overlook the simple question of why he wanted to occupy it. His inability to articulate what he planned to do with the office magnified the underlying doubts about his candidacy.

    In another sense, however, Kennedy's defeat at the hands of a former peanut farmer from Georgia liberated him from the burden of higher office, perhaps also freeing him from the need to live up to the impossible Camelot myth his father and older brothers had fashioned. The Kennedy that emerged from the ashes of defeat in 1980 was suggested by his 1980 convention speech, which biographer Ed Klein says "ranked with the great convention speeches of the past."

    Among Kennedy's memorable lines: "And someday, long after this convention, long after the signs come down and the crowds stop cheering, and the bands stop playing, may it be said of our campaign that we kept the faith. May it be said of our party in 1980 that we found our faith again . . . For me, a few hours ago, this campaign came to an end. For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."

    Kennedy Blazes Legislative Trail

    Although Kennedy's devoted foes might not wish to admit it, his character flaws did not prevent him from amassing one of the most impressive legislative records ever. Among his accomplishments:

     

  •  He won passage of the Hart-Celler Act of 1965, which abolished the national-origin immigration quotas that had been in effect since the 1920s.

     

     

  •  He played a key role in passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

     

     

  •  He helped shepherd Title IX through Congress in 1972, a major step in the battle against gender discrimination which precluded disparate educational funding based on gender.

     

     

  •  Other legislative accomplishments include the COBRA Act of 1985, the 1990 Americans With Disabilities Act, the Civil Rights Act of 1991, and the State Children's Health Insurance Program, which passed in 1997.

     

     

  •  More recently, Kennedy negotiated compromises with President George W. Bush that led to passage of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002.

     

     

  •  A longtime advocate of amnesty for illegal immigrants, Kennedy co-sponsored the Immigration Reform Act of 2007, which failed following a grassroots backlash against lax U.S. border control policies.

     

    Kennedy's legislative accomplishments had a dark side as well. As he worked diligently in the back rooms that Senate deal-makers frequented, his years in the Senate saw a metastatic growth in the size of the federal government. Suggestions that Kennedy's progressive intentions could pave the road to disastrous outcomes were ridiculed as ignorant fear-mongering, even as they are today.

    In 1965, for example, Kennedy dismissed opponents of the Hart-Celler Act, who feared it would contribute to a vast flood of immigration into the United States.

    Kennedy insisted during a hearing: "The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs."

    Four decades later, with more than 12 million illegal immigrants living in the United States, Kennedy's lifelong drive to open up the United States to an influx of immigration has had serious — if not devastating — consequences.

    Historically, Kennedy's most tainted legislative legacy may be his vitriolic, personal attack campaign against brilliant originalist legal scholar Robert Bork.

    Former President Ronald Reagan nominated Bork the nation's highest court in 1987. Kennedy's tactics in defeating the Bork nomination have been blamed for indelibly staining the once-dignified process of Senate confirmation. Kennedy's scorched-earth opposition to Bork injected a spirit of bitter partisanship into the process of confirming the future nominations of both parties' presidents.

    "Robert Bork's America," Kennedy charged before those hearing even got under way, "is a land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizens' doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists could be censored at the whim of government, and the doors of the federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of citizens for whom the judiciary is often the only protector of the individuals rights that are the heart of our democracy."

    Kennedy's broadside was so over the top, and so radical in the context of traditional Senate decorum, that it paralyzed the GOP and mobilized the left. Bork's nomination was defeated.

    "If there had been any question before the Bork nomination of who ran the Senate," the Boston Globe reported, "there was none after."

    Despite Kennedy's influence in the Senate, his reputation as a liberal lion there sustained heavy damage in the early 1990s. His oddly passive performance during the controversial confirmation hearings for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas received strident criticism from the left, with whisperers suggesting Kennedy's reticence to launch ad hominem attacks against Thomas stemmed from his own personal failings.

    Polls suggested that Kennedy's reputation also sustained a blow from the pending sexual-assault trial in a Palm Beach, Fla., incident involving his nephew, William Kennedy Smith, who eventually was acquitted of the charges. Although the senator was not accused of breaking any law in connection with the case, the testimony revealed a seamy side to the Kennedy mystique that voters found distasteful.

    These concerns, as well as Kennedy's looming 1994 re-election campaign, led to the famous "mea culpa" speech he delivered at Harvard, in which he confessed, with wife-to-be Victoria Reggie in the audience: "I am painfully aware that the criticism directed at me in recent months involves far more than disagreements with my positions," said the senator, "or the usual criticism from the far right. It also involves the disappointment of friends and many others who rely on me to fight the good fight.

    "To them I say, I recognize my own shortcomings — the faults in the conduct of my private life. I realize that I alone am responsible for them, and I am the one who must confront them."

    Kennedy remarked that, unlike his brothers, "I have been given length of years and time. And as I approach my 60th birthday, I am determined to give all that I have to advance the causes for which I have stood for almost a quarter of a century."

    Kennedy went on in 1994 to defeat a tough Republican challenger election by the name of Mitt Romney — the future governor of Massachusetts and 2008 contender for the GOP presidential nomination — with 58 percent of the vote.

    Kennedy delivered one of the biggest blows to the presidential aspirations of then-Sen. Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign on Jan. 28, 2008, when he rocked the political world with his unreserved endorsement of Barack Obama for president. His speech neatly cloaked Obama in the Camelot legacy of his iconic brothers:

    "There was another time, when another young candidate was running for president and challenging America to cross a new frontier," Kennedy said. "He faced criticism from the preceding Democratic president, who was widely respected in the party."

    It was a reference to JFK antagonist Harry S. Truman.

    The senator continued: "And John Kennedy replied, 'The world is changing. The old ways will not do . . . It is time for a new generation of leadership.

    "So it is with Barack Obama," Kennedy concluded.

    However, Kennedy's deteriorating health would limit his campaigning on Obama's behalf.

    On May 17, 2008, Kennedy was airlifted to a Cape Cod hospital and received the diagnosis of malignant glioma: brain cancer. But those who thought even this setback would force Kennedy to retire from the public square were mistaken once again. His rousing appearance at the 2008 Democratic National Convention mobilized party faithful to unite behind Obama's candidacy.

    "My fellow Americans . . . it is so wonderful to be here. And nothing, nothing is going to keep me away from this special gathering tonight!" he declared to loud applause.

    After Obama won the presidency, Kennedy fought his declining health to do whatever he could to assist Obama's effort to yank the wheel of America's ship of state hard to the left. And when Obama visited Pope Benedict XVI in July, he delivered a personal letter from Kennedy, and asked that the Pope pray for him. And Kennedy continued to push for his lifelong dream of nationalized healthcare for all Americans.

    Whenever he could muster the strength, Kennedy ventured onto his sailing yacht Mya with family and friends, ever eager to resume his lifelong love affair with the wind and water off the coast of Cape Cod. To the very end, it was a fitting image: Kennedy at the helm, sailing into an uncharted history that would judge both his accomplishments and his failings.

    Kennedy was the second-longest-serving member of the Senate, behind only West Virginia Democrat Robert Byrd, and the third-longest-serving senator of all time.

    The passing of Joseph P. Kennedy's last living son arguably concludes one of the most noteworthy chapters in the nation's political history. The younger family members who grew up in Ted Kennedy's shadow — the children, the grandchildren, the nieces and nephews — all ensure that the Kennedy legacy will endure for generations to come.

    In one of his speeches, Joseph's youngest son spoke of carrying forward the legacy that comes with being a Kennedy.

    "Like my three brothers before me, I pick up a fallen standard," he said, "sustained by their memory of our priceless years together. I shall strive to carry forward that special commitment to justice, to excellence, and courage that distinguished their lives."

    [Editor's Note: Read “The Last Lion of Camelot: Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, 1932-2009” Go here now.] 

    © 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved.   

    COMMENT: While we remember Ted Kennedy's legacy as a man of the people, we cannot forget that he was in the end just a man. A man with demons thrust upon him both by fate and circumstance and by those of his own creation. No doubt his love for his country was beyond question and his efforts to improve the lot of the American people were sincere and  well-intentioned. Had he tempered his vision (as well as his political and personal life) with realistic discipline, perhaps more of his visions for America would have been fulfilled. His legacy will be one based more on speculation as to what could have happened if the Chappaquiddick incident had not occurred. What would have happened if Kennedy could have saved Mary Jo Kopechne that night in 1969? Could he have defeated Richard Nixon in 1972 and changed the history of the past 37 years? Could his vision of America have come true under a Presidency of his own? We will never know. What is certain is this. Ted Kennedy's mark on the American political landscape is indelible and the Kennedy name in American politics will go on. Rest in Peace, Mr. Kennedy.

    "Enough Said!"

  • Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Freedom of Speech: UNDER FIRE!!

    08-26-09
    432 Days to the 2010 Congressional Mid-Term Elections

    "Congress shal make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free excercise thereof; or abridging freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
     The First Amendment of the United States Constitution (1791).

    "I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration."
    Hillary Clinton (2003)

         It seems quite clear to Democratic lawmakers that dissent is no longer patriotic. In their view, dissidents who oppose the liberal agenda are evrything from "Mobsters," "Brown-Shirts," "Fascists"  and of course (in the case of opponents of Barack Obama) "Racists."  Whether the issue is that of health care reform, taxes, education, etc. The far-left has made it their policy to discredit and marginalize any disagreement with liberal dogma by any means necessary. Whether it was Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee's taking a cell phone call when she was supposed to be listening to a cancer survivor at one of their "Town Meetings" (Dog and Pony Shows are what they are) or  blanket accusations of racism from the likes of D-List actress Janeane Garofalo or jabs at Republican voters from hack comic Bill Maher, the rule is quite clear: Silence and  condemn anyone who stands up and speaks out against the Obama administration or it's policy goals no matter the source of that criticism. That includes moderate Democrats (Blue Dogs) who want more debate and open discussion of the issues before the American people. To back up their attacks on dissent, the Dems have brought in Goon Squads from groups like ACORN and the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) to both pack the meeting with Obama supporters and threaten Obama opponents with fear and intimidation. Those are the tactics of tyrants, whether they be Nazi or Communist. There is no room in the public debate for the kind of thuggery and manupulation going on today. Freedom of speech and dissent are vital to Democracy. For either side of the political spectrum to suppress that freedom in the name of their cause is totally counter to what the Founding Fathers envisioned when the First Amendment to the  Constitution was written and what Hillary Clinton spoke of in it's defense. I urge my fellow dissidents not to forget that freedom of speech, to challenge our elected leaders and call them out when they try to run roughshod over our rights as citizens is not only our right, it is our duty. 
     STAND UP, AMERICANS...STAND UP!!!
     DO NOT FEAR THE GOVERNMENT...MAKE THE GOVERNMENT FEAR US!!!  

    "Enough Said!"



    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    What Price Freedom?

    08-20-09
    438 Days to the 2010 Congressional Mid-Term Elections

    Here is something to think about during the debate over health care reform.

    A warning ... circa 1787 re  the fall of the Athenian Republic:

    "A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money (generous gifts) from the public treasury. From that moment on the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most money from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, (which is) always followed by a dictatorship."

    "The average age of the world's greatest civilization has been two hundred years. These nations have progressed through this sequence.

    From bondage to spiritual faith; 
    from spiritual faith to great courage; 
    from courage to liberty; 
    from liberty to abundance, 
    from abundance to selfishness; 
    from selfishness to complacency, 
    from complacency to apathy, 
    from apathy to dependency, 
    from dependence back into bondage."

    Translation: No matter what the government promises you, Nothing is free. The more dependent a people become on the government to take care of them, the more freedom they lose. Would having something like free health care be worth the cost of your liberty? What else would you give up in exchange for the state caring for you from cradle to grave?

    "Enough Said!" 

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    WAY TO GO, BILL!!!

    09-06-09
    452 Days to the 2010 Congressional Mid-Term Elections

    Let's hear it for the DRAFT-DODGING POTHEAD!!!

       Sometimes, even a cad like Bill Clinton can get it right. This was one of those times. This week, the former President brought two American journalists out of North Korea following a meeting with dictator Kim Jong Il, who then pardoned the women who faced 12 years in a forced labor prison for entering the country illegally (for the purpose of espionage). Euna Lee and Laura Ling, both reporters for former Vice-President Al Gore's Current TV Channel were freed just 24 hours after Clinton arrived on a private humanitarian mission to parlay for their release. Whether or not Clinton was working at the clandestine behest of Barack Obama as a back-door operative or was doing a favor for Secretary of State  Hillary Clinton (AKA, The Mrs.)  or Al Gore is subject for speculation, as is whether or not a deal was made with North Korea regarding that country's nuclear program. All that matters at this point is that Lee and Ling are free and safe at home. Could this rescue mission blow up in Obama's face and make him look like he made a deal with Kim Jong Il? Could this make the Clintons look like people who can deliver the goods better than Obama, and thus garner political collateral for Hillary for a possible Presidential run of her own in 2012? Maybe. I would not mind seeing another Clinton Vs. Obama showdown.  Stay Tuned.

    "Enough Said!" 

    P.S.: Good Job, Mr. Clinton.  Oops, I Mean Mr. President.  
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    More Chicago-Style Politics: The Law of the THUG!!

    08-05-09
    453 Days to the 2010 Congressional Mid-Term Elections

    If Rahm Emanuel weren't Obama's Chief of Staff, I'm sure he could find work...in the MAFIA.....


    From Newsmax.com

    Issa Slams Emanuel for 'Chicago'-like Attacks


    Wednesday, August 5, 2009 1:37 PM

    By: Dave Eberhart 

    Rep. Darrell Issa, the ranking Republican on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, is upset that White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel has been intimidating members of Congress and governors who bash the economic stimulus, according to a press release from the lawmaker’s office.

    Issa fired off a letter this week to Emanuel saying, “While this type of scare tactic may work In Chicago, it will not work to intimidate me or other members of the United States Congress.”

    “I and others have dared to bring these facts to the attention of President Obama, the Congress, and the American people,” Issa wrote. “You’ve unfortunately reacted by once again resorting to the playbook of the Chicago political machine,” the California lawmaker added.

    Last month, Politico reported that Emanuel had “launched a coordinated effort to jam” Arizona Sen. Jon Kyl and other administration critics.

    “After seeing Kyl and House Minority Whip Eric Cantor, R-Va., again paint the legislation as a failure on Sunday talk shows, White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel directed that letters from the Cabinet secretaries be sent to [Arizona’s Republican Governor Jan] Brewer, according to two administration officials,” Politico charged.

    In his missive to Emanuel Issa levied his own charges: “The fact that the letters were coordinated by you to maximize the level of intimidation is supported by the timing, structure, and content of each letter. Not only were the four letters all sent the day following Senator Kyl’s remarks, but they were also remarkably similar in tone and sentence structure.”

    Following is some of the text of a couple of the letters lambasted by Issa:

     

  •  Letter from Ray LaHood, Secretary of Transportation:

     

    “On Sunday, Arizona Sen. Jon Kyl publicly questioned whether the stimulus is working and stated that he wants to cancel projects that aren’t presently under way. I believe the stimulus has been very effective in creating job opportunities throughout the country. However, if you prefer to forfeit the money we are making available to your state, as Sen. Kyl suggests, please let me know . . .”

     

  •  Letter from Ken Salazar, secretary of the Interior:

     

    “Some key Republican leaders in Congress have publicly questioned whether the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is working and suggested cancelling all projects that are not currently in progress. I believe they are wrong. The stimulus funds provided through the Recovery Act are a very effective way to create job opportunities throughout the Country. However, if you prefer to forfeit the money we are making available to Arizona, please let me know . . .”

    “At what point do you believe your practice of Chicago-style politics violates a public official’s right to speak out in favor of alternative policies?” Issa asked in his letter. “The American people have a right to know what role you played in developing the threatening letters to Gov. Brewer and whether you intend to continue to engage in these tactics in the future.”

    In order to assist the Committee with its investigation of the alleged intimidations, Issa set forth a shopping list of demands to Emanuel:

     

  •  Your response to Politico’s report that “White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel directed that the letters from the cabinet secretaries be sent to [Governor] Brewer, according to two administration officials.”

     

     

  •  A full and complete explanation of the development of the four July 13 letters from the cabinet secretaries to Gov. Brewer, including but not limited to the role you or any other White House official played in writing the letters or encouraging the writing of the letters.

     

     

  •  All records and communications between you and Secretary LaHood, Secretary Salazar, Secretary Donovan, and Secretary Vilsack referring or relating to the decision to send the July 13 letters to Gov. Brewer.

     

     

  •  A full and complete explanation of the role of the Democratic National Committee and the White House Office of Political Affairs in authoring, encouraging, facilitating, or directing the four July 13 letters from the cabinet secretaries to Gov. Brewer.

     

    In addition to the investigative demands, Issa used the letter as an opportunity to showcase his own criticism of the stimulus.

    “I thought the outdated and discredited Keynesian economic theory behind your effort was misguided and I opposed the stimulus,” Issa wrote to Emanuel. “Unfortunately, recent economic data has validated my opposition. The U.S. economy lost 433,000 jobs in June, bringing the unemployment rate to 9.5 percent. These job losses come on the heels of other declining economic indicators, and bring the total number of American jobs lost since President Obama took office to over 2.6 million.”

    Issa further noted a Politico report that in response to the letters, Gov. Brewer "knew she'd been thrown a high, hard one."

    The incensed lawmaker also noted that the president of the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry felt the need to respond to these tactics by penning a column under the headline: "Mr. President: Don't Bully Arizona."

    In the final paragraphs, Issa challenged Emanuel: “The American people have a right to know what role you played in developing the threatening letters to Gov. Brewer and whether you intend to continue to engage in these tactics in the future.

    “Since I represent a district in the great state of California, I hope that you will not take this letter as an indication of Gov. Schwarzenegger's position on stimulus funds dedicated to California nor his position on any other public policy issue. I can assure you that any attempt to intimidate me or silence my criticism of the stimulus through such Chicago-style tactics will be futile.”

     

     

     

    © 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

    COMMENT: Al Capone, Frank Nitti and the rest of the Chicago Mob would be proud. Remember, folks. You wanted Change. Well here it is. Frankly, I'm hoping Eliot Ness is on the way.

    "Enough Said!"


  • Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    CNN Reporter Shows Guts!!

    08-04-09
    455 Days to the 2010 Congressional Mid-Term Elections
    Here's one for the books... 
    CNN, that great bastion of liberal tought, is taking heat from the far-left because one of their own has the guts to address what is becoming an issue that just won't  go away. An issue that goes right to the character of "President" Obama.

    From Newsmax.com

    Lou Dobbs Right on Obama Birth Certificate

    Monday, August 3, 2009 9:48 AM

    By: Newsmax Staff 

    The Associated Press is wrong and Lou Dobbs is right.

     

    This past weekend, the AP published a story entitled "CNN's Dobbs Under Fire for Hosting 'Birthers'".

     

    The AP began their highly critical story on Dobbs: "He's become a publicity nightmare for CNN, embarrassed his boss and hosted a show that seemed to contradict the network's 'no bias' brand."

     

    And what is Dobbs' "crime?" He has said on air that Obama should release his birth certificate and has had on his show guests who suggested Obama was born outside the U.S.

     

    Dobbs does not believe Obama was born outside the U.S., nor does Newsmax. The evidence indicates he was born in Hawaii. But the indisputable fact is that Obama has not released his birth certificate, which the state of Hawaii issues for all citizens born there. The AP implies that Obama has not released a "long version of his birth certificate." But Obama has never released either a long or short version of his birth certificate.

    Instead, Obama's campaign last year released only his Certification of Live Birth from the state of Hawaii, which is a document that offers a summarized version of the birth certificate. Even state residents born outside the U.S. can get one.

    During the 2008 presidential campaign, GOP nominee Sen. John McCain quickly released his birth certificate when liberal bloggers raised questions about his eligibility to be president. McCain was born at a military hospital in Panama.

    Obama likewise could put the matter to rest by releasing his actual birth certificate, which would show, among other things, the place of his birth and the doctor who performed the birth procedure.

    This information is not provided on the Certification of Live Birth.

    As it stands, Obama is the only president in history whose birthplace is unknown to the public – a fact that would be stated on the actual birth certificate. Interestingly, his family has mentioned two different hospitals in Hawaii as the place of birth.

    Obama’s refusal to release his birth certificate does mean that Obama remains one of America’s most mysterious and opaque presidents ever.

    Obama, for example, has not released many other documents regarding his public and private life.

    Many of these documents were sought by reporters, who easily acquiesced when Obama said he would not release them – though most presidential candidates release them as a perfunctory matter.

    Among the key documents that Obama continues to shield from the public:

    • Obama released just one brief document detailing his personal health. McCain, on the other hand, released what he said was his complete medical file, totaling more than 1,500 pages.

    • Obama refused to offer his official papers as a state legislator in Illinois. Nor did he produce correspondence, such as his schedules of appointments or letters from lobbyists, from his days in the Illinois state Senate.

    • Obama did not release his client list as an attorney or his billing records. He maintained that he performed only a few hours of legal work for a nonprofit organization with ties to Tony Rezko, the Chicago businessman convicted of fraud in June 2008 but did not release billing records that would prove this assertion.

    • Obama ignored requests for his records from Occidental College, where he studied for two years before transferring to Columbia University.

    • Obama’s campaign refused to give Columbia, where he earned an undergraduate degree in political science, permission to release his transcripts. Former President George W. Bush and presidential contenders Al Gore and John Kerry all released their college transcripts.

    • Obama did not agree to the release of his application to the Illinois State Bar, which would have cleared up intermittent allegations that his application may have been inaccurate.

    • Obama did not release records from his time at Harvard Law School.

    • During the presidential campaign, McCain’s campaign released a full list of all online donors. Obama’s campaign still has not released the names of those who donated at least one-third of the $750 million he raised.

     

    Ironically, Obama accused the Bush White House of being "one of the most secretive administrations in our history," and chided then-Sen. Hillary Clinton for not releasing her White House schedules.

    © 2009 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

    COMMENT: Lou Dobbs has it right. Not just about Obama's birth certificate, but about everything else being hidden or covered up. Obama promised transparency. What is he hiding? We who must suffer his socialist agenda have every right to know what kind of man is sitting in the Oval Office. As for Dobbs, if CNN sends him packing I'm sure Fox News Channel will make room for him. Keep it up, Lou.

    Enough Said!"

    P.S.: Happy Birthday, Mr. Obama. Let's see your birth certificate. 

     



    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    21 things you can't say to Obama

    07-30-09
    459 Days to the 2010 Congressional Mid-Term Elections

    From the Polotico

    21 things you can't say to Obama
    By: Roger Simon 
    July 28, 2009 04:40 AM EST

    A new feature: Ask Dr. Politics! You ask the questions; we feed your delusions. 

    Dear Dr. Politics: I am reliably informed that following Barack Obama’s last news conference, a list was circulated in the White House of 21 things the staff was not allowed to say to the president. The mainstream media refuses to publish the list. You are our only hope, even though we have the utmost contempt for you. 

    Reply: Glad to oblige. Here are “The 21 Things You Cannot Say to the President after a News Conference”: 

    1. Hey, we hear the Golf Channel is going to carry it next time. Well, actually, only the Golf Channel is going to carry it next time. 

    2. Don’t worry. We’ll get ’em next year. 

    3. Professor Gates called. He can’t find his house keys. 

    4. You want to take a mulligan on this one? 

    5. We did try to plant a question about Bo, but nobody would go for it. 

    6. Saying, “I don’t know all the facts ... but the police acted stupidly” is a little like saying, “I don’t know if there are weapons of mass destruction ... but let’s invade Iraq anyway.” 

    7. We’ve decided to call the whole news conference a “teachable moment.” 

    8. You want a cigarette? 

    9. Biden called. 

    10. William Henry “Bill” Gates is the Microsoft guy. Robert Michael Gates is the secretary of defense guy. Henry Louis Gates Jr. is the Harvard professor. They are not related and have never performed in Vegas together. Gibbs will walk this back in the gaggle. 

    11. Tape it over? But, Mr. President, these press conferences are live. 

    12. The reason we can’t put the questions on the teleprompter is because we aren’t supposed to know the questions in advance. 

    13. Those bunched-up clothes in the bed turned out not to be Douglas Elmendorf. 

    14. That reporter wasn’t from North Carolina; he was from North Korea. 

    15. Hillary called. 

    16. You want a blue pill? 

    17. We checked: After six months, they can’t fire you. 

    18. If nobody blogs about it, we think you’ll be OK. 

    19. Now, is somebody willing to rehearse more and play golf less? 

    20. The only poll that counts is the one on Election Day. 

    21. Rahm wants to see you in his office immediately.

    Dear Dr. Politics: I saw you make fun of the “birthers” on TV. You think we are a bunch of nuts and wackos. That just shows how pathetic you are. In fact, we are ordinary citizens — doctors, lawyers, teachers, plumbers, Pilates instructors — who are not afraid to speak the truth. We are Americans. We are your neighbors. Though once we gather enough dilithium crystals, we probably will be leaving your planet. 

    Reply: Why do the birthers waste all their time arguing that Barack Obama was not born in Hawaii, when a legal document clearly shows that he was? The only real argument, it seems to us, is whether Hawaii is legitimately a state or actually a sovereign kingdom that is not part of the United States. 

    Dr. Politics put his crack research staff (Wikipedia) on this. It found under the heading “Apology Resolution” that on Nov. 23, 1993, the U.S. Congress adopted legislation creating United States Public Law 103-150, commonly known as the Apology Resolution, and that President Bill Clinton signed it shortly thereafter. 

    Dr. Politics is not making this up. The law states that Congress “acknowledges that the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii occurred with the active participation of agents and citizens of the United States and further acknowledges that the Native Hawaiian people never directly relinquished to the United States their claims to their inherent sovereignty as a people over their national lands, either through the Kingdom of Hawaii or through a plebiscite or referendum.” 

    True, on March 31 of this year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the “Apology Resolution did not strip Hawaii of its sovereign authority to alienate the lands the United States held in absolute fee and granted to the State upon its admission to the Union.” 

    We are not sure what this means. But we think it means Barack Obama is still president. At least until there is a ruling from the United Federation of Planets. 

    Roger Simon is POLITICO’s chief political columnist.

    Copyright 2009,Capitol News Company, LLC

    COMMENT: I have one more thing you can't say to Obama: Why won't you release your real birth certificate?

    "Enough Said!" 

     




    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    BORN IN THE USA: OBAMA HAD BETTER PROVE IT!!

    07-29-09
    460 Days to the 2010 Congressional Mid-Term Elections

    This one ain't goin' away on it's own...

        Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution says it in NO uncertain terms: " No person except a natural-born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have atained the age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States." Barack Obama might have a problem with that first part, about being a "natural-born" citizen. All he has to do to is release his birth certificate for public inspection and that problem will go away. For some reason, he is quite reluctant to do so and has had an army of lawyers all over the country challenging lawsuits demanding he fork over his birth certificate. Critics and commentators, both left and right, have decried these suits accusing so-called "Birthers" of being everything from whacked-out sore losers to outright racists. Even conservatives like Michael Medved and Ann Coulter have distanced themselves, fearing they would be grouped with "Birthers." Their main argument is that any public credence they might give to the allegation could be toxic to Republican hopes of regaining control of Congress in next year's mid-term elections. Granted it is a valid argument to be sure, but that doesn't make the issue go away. 

     Consider this.  In the six months he has been  President,  Obama has spent TRILLIONS of dollars we tax-payers don't have on the greatest expansion of government in history. The price tag for his vision of universal health care, economic stimulus and other socialist goals will haunt us for generations.Obama has compromised our national security to appease our enemies and crippled our economy to atone for our alledged crimes against the environment. If it turns out he is not Constitionally eligible to be President, every action he has carried out since his inauguration , every executive order he has signed and every appointment from Vice-President Biden to his entire cabinet (Which under the 25th Amendment would make up his line of succession) would be null and void. If that were to become the case, under the 25th, Nancy Pelosi would be the only qualified successor as Speaker of the House. Not to mention the kind of public acrimony such a constitutional crisis would trigger (Think Watergate on steroids). Then there is the matter of national security and Obama's authority as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces. There can be no question about the President's authority to send our troops into combat, let alone launch nuclear weapons (which only the President can order). One Army officer has already refused  a deployment order citing Obama's citizenship. What if the Joint Chiefs of Staff had doubts? We could very well see a military paralyzed in a time of crisis at best, a military coup at worst.  Obama needs to put an end to this before it gets too far out of hand. All he needs to do is release his birth certificate to settle the issue once and for all. For this country's sake.

    "Enough Said!"
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    ENOUGH ALREADY!!!

    07-17-09
    472 Days to the 2010 Mid-Term Congressional Elections

    It's been two weeks since Michael Jackson died....ENOUGH ALREADY!!! 

        While the rest of the country has been mourning another drugged out celebrity with no self-control who could not keep his pants on (especially around little boys), while every major "news" outlet has been prostituting themselves trying to scoop one another for any dirt they can find to bolster their ratings, while conspiracy theorists are already screaming "Murder", we have been getting SCREWED OVER BY OUR OWN GOVERNMENT!!! 

        While we weren't looking, the House passed the so-called "Cap And Trade" bill aimed at reducing carbon emissions, carbon dioxide (CO2) levels in particular into the atmosphere by requiring heavy industry to pay penalties (TAXES) if their factories spew too much CO2, forcing them to either invest in cleaner but more expensive sources of energy to operate or shut down and leave hundreds (if not thousands) out of work. Electrical companies that use coal-fired power plants to provide electricity to cities would have to switch from cheaper (reliable)  coal to solar or wind power (not reliable). The cost of that conversion would (of course) be passed on to the customer with higher utility costs. If they choose to stay with coal, the government stricks them with higher penalties (TAXES) which then get passed onto the customer with higher utility costs. Looks to me like a BACK-DOOR TAX on those of us who don't make $250 thousand a year. So much for Obama's pledge not to raise taxes on the middle class. 

       The Socialist-Democrats are trying to jam a healthcare bill down our throats that will, in effect set up a government-run HMO that would give bureaucrats the power to override decisions best made by doctors regarding the treatment of patients and ration out medical care based on cost-effectiveness. In essence, if you are over 50, you can forget about a heart bypass because you aren't worth the price of the procedure. People are coming down from Canada (where the government controls healthcare) to get proper care because  the government won't pay for the treatment needed to save their lives. How will this great step towards a more "enlightened" and wonderful society be paid for??  HIGHER TAXES!!! Obama keeps saying those who already have healthcare benefits can keep them. They will just be considered income subject to taxation. Employers will drop their healthcare benefits (or be penalized for not carrying medical insurance) and workers will be forced to enroll in the government plan. If an employer tries to maintain healthcare benefits for his workers, some of those workers will be laid off to cover that expense. Higher taxes, higher unemployment, rationing of services and waiting periods for treatment that could be a death sentence for those who would need time-critical care . Don't even try to convince me this is a good plan. This is GARBAGE!!!

        Of course nobody was watching, except those who truly care about this country. I guess most of us were more concerned about the passing of a pervert rather than the destruction of our nation. Such will be our fate unless we get our minds back on what is important today.

    "Enough Said!"
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    3 GOP JERKS AND A NATION IS IN PERIL!!!

    07-07-09
    482 Days to the 2010 Congressional Mid-Term Elections

    With people like these calling themselves Republicans, we might as well give Obama a second term now and forget 2012.

    1) Governor Mark Sanford (SC). He decides to go all the way down to Argentina for a tryst with his mistresss, telling his staff and family he was on a hiking trip on the Appalachian Trail. He does not transfer legal power to his Lt. Governor and sneaks out of the country. In essence, he went AWOL. Question: What would have happened if there was anatural disaster or terrorist attack in South Carolina and the only person with legal authority to muster the National Guard was in Buenos Aires with his girlfriend. The State Legislature has slapped him with a reprimand (Censure). I thought John Edwards was a sleazebag. All Edwards did was lie to his wife and try to pay off his paramour. Sanford lied to the people who elected him and left them hanging. This guy is worse.

    2) Senator John Ensign (NV). Ensign owned up to having an affair with a campaign staffer during his 2008 re-election bid. Ensign went public about his affair after his mistress' husband, a former administraive assistant, asked for a substantial sum of money. Isn't that what they used to call BLACKMAIL?  His only saving grace is that Nevada's other Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D) is more disliked. God help Nevadans.

    3) Arnold Schwarzenegger (CA). Granted, he did not get caught with his pants down. All he did was run his state's economy into the ground. $26.3 billion in debt, paying bills with IOUs, unemployment going through the roof. California is in worse shape now than it was in 2002 when "The Governator" was elected to clean up Gray Davis' mess. Either the steroids have finally rotted his brains or he's been listening to his in-laws (The Kennedy/Shriver family) for way too long. He might as well hand the state over to Jerry Brown now.

         To Paraphrase the late John Belushi, John Ensign and Mark Sanford were on the short list for the Republican presidential nomination in 2012. They could have been contenders to run Barack Obama out of the White House and save this country from total disaster at the hands of Liberal Socialists. BUT NOOO!!! They could not keep their pants on and stay true to those who voted them into office. They let their libidos overrule their conscience and their common sense. Thanks, guys.

         As for Arnold Schwarzenegger, If he had kept true to his pledge to fiscal responsibility, stood up to those Democratic PIMPS in Sacramento and used the veto pen more often on insane spending, If he'd put a stop to social services for illegal aliens and maybe reduced (or eliminated) the state income tax, If he'd stood up to the Hollywood Environmental Diletantes like Ted Danson or Ed Begley and Ok'd oil drilling off the California coastline. California, the world's 8th largest economy, would not be in near-ruin. Danke, Arnold.

    With IDIOTS like these in the Republican Party, WE ARE DOOMED!!!

    "Enough Said!"


    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
    « Previous12345Next »